« Godspeed, Major Andrew Olmsted:
Citizen, arm thyself: »

Doubleyou.Tee.Eff.

So EvilEgg, in a fit of “OMG BABY ANIMAL,” posted this picture on her LJ:

My first thought: My God, that piglet looks like Ron Paul.

Mike can see it, too. Can you?

Last Modified: Monday, January 7th, 2008 @ 02:23

This entry was posted on Monday, January 7th, 2008 at 2:23 am and is filed under Election 2008, Random. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Politics, Guns & Beer.

Comments RSS feed | Trackback URL

5 Comments »

Comment by Mike H
2008-01-07 06:17:15

I have been an avid reader of your blog for a couple months after a friend pointed it out to me. Keep up the good work!

And yes, that pig looks like Ron Paul…I don’t think he will be happy to see his name associated with pork in any way. :P

Reply to this comment
 
Comment by Sean..just call me wolfie
2008-01-07 11:03:35

Uhmmm Laurel? Were you really tired and not drinking any coffee for a pick me up when you saw that picture? just curious cuz it looks like a pig to me. :P

Sean

Reply to this comment
 
Comment by George
2008-01-07 11:47:07

You know what’s really funny? They have the same chance of winning the primary too!

Reply to this comment
 
Comment by Yuri Orlov
2008-01-12 23:30:02

Yeah, I see it too…though the ears make it look a little bit like Ross Perot.

*ducks*

;-)

Reply to this comment
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
Website
Subscribe to comments via email

Comments from first-time commenters are moderated and will only appear after I approve them. Provided you use the same name and email address in the future, however, subsequent comments should appear immediately. If you encounter any problems, please email me and let me know. Thanks!

Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.